Suvinder Vicky plays Arjun Rampal’s on-screen father in Dhurandhar 2.
Their characters share repeated profanity-heavy exchanges.
Vicky feared the dialogue could be censored or reduced to beeps.
He says director Aditya Dhar believed the lines would remain intact.
Vicky credits the writing team, director and his own performance for the scenes’ impact.
He says the abusive language came from the script rather than his improvisation.
Dhar reportedly stopped him from adding references to mothers and sisters.
Vicky describes that boundary as a responsibility to avoid hurting sentiments.
Audiences responded warmly to the brief role and created memes around it.
Vicky contrasts that reception with his negative character and release difficulties in Satluj.
He argues that audiences can distinguish an actor from a frightening fictional character.
A quick read on shared facts, changing details, and different emphasis.
The coverage broadly agrees that Vicky’s profanity-heavy scenes were scripted, survived anticipated censorship, and became memorable because of a deliberate boundary on how far the abuse could go. Reports also note the role’s warm audience response, though some supplied articles provide only limited detail.
The exact nature of the abusive dialogues and the specific reactions of Arjun Rampal beyond a general statement are not fully detailed across all reports, leaving room for further clarification.
Swipe through the perspectives. Labels describe coverage framing, not truth or quality.
Supportive coverage presents Vicky’s performance as a successful example of authentic character acting. It highlights his credits to the director, writers and himself, along with Dhar’s confidence that the dialogue would not be censored. These reports also emphasize the audience’s positive response, memes and the deliberate limit against references to mothers and sisters. The framing generally treats the profanity as purposeful within the film’s dramatic context.
Mixed coverage acknowledges that the profanity was scripted and retained, while also emphasizing the boundary against references to mothers and sisters. It presents Vicky’s concern about censorship alongside the filmmakers’ confidence that the dialogue would remain. The overall framing balances the scene’s audience appeal with an awareness of responsibility around offensive language.
The latest eight dated reports, from earliest to newest.
Attributed summaries from official party channels. These are claims, not independent reporting or fact checks.
Scan each source take, then open the original article.
Hindustan Times reports Suvinder Vicky’s reflections on playing a profanity-heavy character in Dhurandhar 2, including repeated abuse directed at Arjun Rampal’s on-screen character. Vicky says audiences responded warmly, creating memes about the role, and argues actors must portray difficult or frightening characters authentically. He contrasts the blockbuster’s reception with Satluj, where he plays a negative character amid release problems.
The Times of India focuses on Suvinder Vicky’s concern that his profanity-heavy Dhurandhar 2 dialogue would be censored. Vicky says he suggested making the character mute, but director Aditya Dhar believed the lines would remain. He credits Dhar, himself and the screenwriter, while recalling that Dhar prevented him from improvising certain abusive references. The supplied article ends before fully detailing that restriction.
The Indian Express reports that Suvinder Vicky’s brief role as Arjun Rampal’s on-screen father became notable for abusive exchanges. Vicky says he joked that the dialogue might be censored and suggested a mute role, while Aditya Dhar confidently predicted nothing would be cut. He credits the director, writers and his own effort, emphasizing that the abusive language was scripted rather than invented by him.
The Times of India describes Suvinder Vicky’s account of filming abuse-heavy scenes with Arjun Rampal in Dhurandhar: The Revenge. Vicky credits director Aditya Dhar, the writing team and his own effort, and recalls joking that the dialogue might be censored. He says Dhar stopped him from adding more extreme language, specifically references to mothers and sisters, citing a responsibility not to hurt sentiments.
India TV reports Suvinder Vicky’s explanation of the abusive scenes between his character and Arjun Rampal’s Major Iqbal in Dhurandhar Part 2. Vicky says the language came from the original script and credits the director and writers. He recalls fearing censorship, then considering further improvisation after being reassured. The supplied text ends while describing how Dhar stopped him from taking the language further.
Times Now reports Suvinder Vicky’s comments on playing Arjun Rampal’s father in Dhurandhar 2. Vicky says the role was brief but memorable because of its profane exchanges, and credits Aditya Dhar, the writers and himself for their impact. He recalls expecting censorship and says Dhar allowed the dialogue to remain while drawing a boundary against references to mothers and sisters. The article also mentions Rampal’s reaction.
NewsX recounts Suvinder Vicky’s concern that the profane dialogue written for his Dhurandhar 2 character could be censored. Vicky says he warned Aditya Dhar that his whole dialogue might become a beep and suggested a mute role. Dhar reportedly remained confident the lines would stay. Vicky credits the screenwriters for the abuse and explains that Dhar did not allow him to use certain forms of abusive language.
ZoomTV Entertainment focuses on Suvinder Vicky’s contrasting experiences in Satluj and Dhurandhar 2. Vicky says his minor, profanity-heavy Dhurandhar 2 role received audience affection and generated memes, while he expected viewers to abuse him for his negative role in Satluj. He argues that audiences can distinguish fiction from reality and that authentic performances help convey frightening historical events to viewers unfamiliar with them.
Gulf News presents Suvinder Vicky’s account of how the profanity in Dhurandhar 2 was written and retained. Vicky says he expected censorship and joked that the character might as well be mute, but Aditya Dhar believed the dialogue would remain. Vicky attributes the language to the screenwriter and says Dhar rejected adding abuse aimed at mothers or sisters, framing that boundary as a responsibility to avoid hurting sentiments.