President Droupadi Murmu appointed chief justices to eight High Courts.
The appointments were announced by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on social media.
The Centre said the moves were made after consultation with the Chief Justice of India.
Reports say the appointments followed Supreme Court collegium recommendations.
Justice Sanjay Kumar Agrawal was appointed to head the Rajasthan High Court.
One Rajasthan appointment comes amid conduct concerns and lawyer protests, which Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma has denied.
A quick read on shared facts, changing details, and different emphasis.
All the reports agree that eight High Courts received new chief justice appointments and that the President acted after consultation with the Chief Justice of India. They also agree that the Rajasthan posting is linked to a separate controversy involving acting chief justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma.
The full set of individual postings is not repeated in every report, so the complete list of assignments is only partially reflected here. The Rajasthan controversy remains contested, with allegations raised and denied, and further institutional review may shape how it is understood.
Swipe through the perspectives. Labels describe coverage framing, not truth or quality.
The central reporting focuses on a formal judicial reshuffle affecting eight High Courts. It says President Droupadi Murmu made the appointments under constitutional powers after consulting the Chief Justice of India, and that the announcement was communicated by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. The coverage also notes that the appointments place new judges in leadership roles at their respective High Courts. In the Rajasthan case, the story includes allegations, protests, and a denial, but does not resolve the dispute.
The latest eight dated reports, from earliest to newest.
Attributed summaries from official party channels. These are claims, not independent reporting or fact checks.
Scan each source take, then open the original article.
President Droupadi Murmu appointed eight High Court judges as Chief Justices following consultations with the Chief Justice of India, as announced by Law and Justice Minister Arjunram Meghwal on social media. The Hindu reports that Justice Sanjay Kumar Agarwal's appointment to the Rajasthan High Court occurs amid an ongoing controversy involving Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, where a Supreme Court judge raised conduct concerns and lawyers protested, though Justice Sharma has denied the allegations. The article details several other judicial transfers and appointments across different state high courts.
Law Trend reports that the Centre has formally notified the appointment of Chief Justices to eight High Courts nationwide. Union Minister of State for Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal announced that President Droupadi Murmu made these appointments using constitutional powers after consulting with the Chief Justice of India. The publication notes that these official notifications will place the eight newly appointed judges at the leadership positions of their respective High Courts across the country.
Live Law reports that the Central Government notified the appointments of Chief Justices at eight High Courts following recommendations made by the Supreme Court collegium on August 9 and August 31. Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal shared the announcement on X, stating the President made the appointments under constitutional powers after consulting the Chief Justice of India. The report lists all eight specific judicial appointments and their corresponding new high court assignments.
The Centre has approved the appointment of Justice Sanjay Kumar Agrawal as the Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court, alongside seven other judicial appointments following recommendations by the Supreme Court Collegium. This decision followed letters from Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta raising administrative concerns regarding the former acting chief justice. The Chief Justice of India noted that the allegations require institutional review rather than public adjudication. Additionally, the government cleared new chief justices for several other high courts across the country.