SC to hear Tejpal’s plea before surrender question
56 sourcesUpdated 24 Aug 2026, 9:25 pmCoverage regionsInternational · Global · India · Bihar
CATCH ME UP
The Supreme Court said it will pass an order on Tarun Tejpal’s plea for exemption from surrender.
Tejpal was convicted in a 2013 rape case by the Bombay High Court.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued the appeal was not maintainable because Tejpal had not filed a separate exemption application or surrendered.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal said surrender was not necessary yet because the high court had granted time.
More context
Justice Alok Aradhe said he would issue an appropriate order and scheduled the matter for the following day.
AGREEMENT VS DISAGREEMENT
What lines up. What splits.
A quick read on shared facts, changing details, and different emphasis.
What coverage agrees on
All available reports agree that the Supreme Court is first addressing Tejpal’s surrender-exemption plea before proceeding with his appeal against conviction.
What is changing or disputed
The immediate next step is still pending because the court has not yet issued its order on the exemption plea, and the schedule for the appeal remains tied to that decision.
HOW COVERAGE DIFFERS
Same story. Different emphasis.
Swipe through the perspectives. Labels describe coverage framing, not truth or quality.
Neutral2
The Supreme Court is considering Tarun Tejpal’s request for exemption from surrender in connection with his conviction in a 2013 rape case. The court heard opposing arguments from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate Kapil Sibal. One account says Mehta relied on Supreme Court Rules, while also noting the court’s power to waive the requirement. Justice Alok Aradhe said an appropriate order would be issued and set the matter for the following day.
STORY TIMELINE
How the coverage developed
The latest eight dated reports, from earliest to newest.
The Supreme Court announced it will pass an order on former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal's plea seeking an exemption from surrender after his conviction in a 2013 rape case by the Bombay High Court. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Goa government, argued that the appeal was inadmissible because Tejpal had not filed a separate exemption application or surrendered. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Tejpal, contended that no surrender was necessary yet since the high court had granted time, leading Justice Alok Aradhe to state he would issue an appropriate order.
A Single-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court stated that journalist Tarun Tejpal's appeal against his 10-year sentence in a 2013 rape case cannot be listed without deciding his application for surrender exemption. Justice Alok Aradhe scheduled the case for the following day and asked senior advocate Kapil Sibal to address the merits of the application. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed the plea citing Supreme Court Rules, while noting the apex court's power to waive the requirement. The proceedings follow the Bombay High Court's conviction of Tejpal, overturning a prior acquittal.
Everyside groups reporting about the same event and shows the publisher orientation attached to each source. These labels describe publisher orientation, not the truth, quality or framing of an individual article.